We didn't have much luck with the supplied Corsair DDR4 modules, but GSkill stepped in to provide one of its new Flare X branded kits - two 8GB modules with low 14-14-14-34 latency and 3200MHz bandwidth. Additional headers are provided for those looking to watercool their system, while the board curiously has a surfeit of ATX power inputs - the usual 24-pin and eight-pin inputs are joined by further four-pin and six-pin sockets. Intel provides the Gigabit LAN controller, with Realtek's ALC1220 codec in play. The 'steel armour' PCI Express ports support both CrossFire and SLI, while there's no shortage of USB 2.0, 3.0, 3.1 and Type-C support. We received the 1800X initially along with the MSI Xpower Gaming Titanium - one of the most feature-packed and indeed expensive boards available based on the X370 chipset.ĭefinitely skewed to the luxury end of the market, the Xpower Gaming Titanium features a unique faux-metallic colour scheme paired with the usual top-end features - support for high-end storage including six SATA-3 ports, twin M.2 connections and an additional U.2 port. Different outlets received different boards paired with different processors - with Asus, Gigabyte and MSI represented as partners for the Ryzen 7 1800X, 1700X and 1700. Our test system, featuring the MSI Xpower Gaming TitaniumĪMD provided motherboards, coolers, processors and memory to the majority of the specialist press, including Digital Foundry. On our MSI board, equipped with a fresh BIOS, everything just worked - 'A-XMP' set-up almost everything to spec, though DRAM voltage needed to be manually set. Things are improving though - GSkill provided new Flare X-branded modules that feature low C14 latency and 3200MHz speed. Our review would concentrate on gaming performance and as all of our recent CPU reviews have revealed, in-game frame-rates have a close relationship with clock-speed and memory frequency. AMD suggested loosened latency timings and lower bandwidth, but we still couldn't get it to work as it should (despite other reviewers with the same kit getting better results). We used two boards during our testing, an MSI X370 XPower Gaming Titanium and an Asus ROG Crosshair 6 Hero - both supplied by AMD - but try as we might, the supplied Corsair 3000MHz DDR4 modules in our press package would not work at anything like their stated frequencies. One aspect we have to take into account is that the AM4 Summit Ridge platform is in its earliest days. But equally, our own tests confirm less impressive results posted by many: Ryzen 7's gaming performance does not match up to Intel's on most titles. By this measure alone, AMD's return to a competitive footing in the x86 processor market is a remarkable achievement. We can confirm that the top-tier Ryzen 7 1800X does indeed match and occasionally even exceed Intel's mighty Core i7 6900K octo-core/16-thread monster on a great many benchmarks and heavily multi-threaded workloads. We're late with our Ryzen 7 review for a number of reasons, and some might argue that the key story has already been told.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |